LAST WINTER, THREE OF OUR FAVORITE SEATTLE BARS SHUT DOWN FOR GOOD. CAN WE LEARN ANYTHING FROM THEIR CLOSURES?

CLOSING TIME

WRITTEN BY ADAM WILLEMS

PHOTOGRAPHY BY MERON MENGHISTAB


At the tail end of 2025, three of our favorite spots around town were shutting down.

Meron had been a longtime regular at Columbia City Ale House, an unfussy tavern embodying the neighborhood’s former feel; it closed prematurely in September, only midway into its lease.

And I’d grown fond two places that closed in December:

The Waterwheel Lounge, a delightful dive bar along 15th Ave NW in north Ballard, with plush leather seating indoors and a quirky astroturfed patio; it was making way for a new-build apartment complex;

The Shanty Tavern, a roadhouse and longtime community anchor along Lake City Way, whose 94-year-old owner and bartender decided it was time to retire.

We were bummed. Sure, cities are dynamic places, especially Seattle: defined by its transience since its founding as a settler city, and long before then. But buildings and businesses don’t come and go as easily as individuals do; as they become the sites of major and mundane moments in our lives, we become attached to them, growing older as they grow older.

For those of us who haven’t experienced war or disaster, we often conflate local businesses’ physical fixedness with long-term stability. Yet our shoddy calculus fails to account for the kitchen sink of needs that keeps an institution going — whether that’s basic economics or personal drive and labor — leaving us caught off guard when the music stops and the taps run dry.

Facing these watering holes’ impending end, we wanted to understand how patrons would send them off:

Would their last calls feel like a going-away party? A funeral? A town hall? An autopsy?

And what might our findings mean for the future of Seattle: a city continuing to grow, arguably by necessity, yet expanding in the homogenizing image of the real-estate ventures leading much of the charge?

The best way to find out, we decided, was to attend these last nights in person, order a drink or two, and suss things out without getting too sentimental ourselves — hopefully. And then huddle, chat with some experts and government officials, assemble a CHUM News research report, and get back to you.

Our nights out, some of our conversations, and our lessons learned below.

Rick Ross performs with the Seattle Symphony at Benaroya Hall (May 6, 2026). Photo: John Pendleton

EXHIBIT A: THE WATERWHEEL LOUNGE (1974 - 2025)

The easiest way to witness the full gamut of emotions that could plausibly accompany a bar’s last night in existence was to attend the Waterwheel Lounge’s sendoff on December 31st. I showed up 10 minutes before opening, finding a thirty-odd-person line of longtime regulars hoping to snag a seat. A floral wreath, the kind you’d see at funerals and wakes, stood propped up on an easel outside the bar’s entrance. When staff opened the Waterwheel’s doors for business for the last time, they were wearing Custom Ink-y black T-shirts to mark the occasion. They seemed just as sullen as the patrons filing in and nestling into their favorite nooks; a handful of customers rushed to give long hugs to the Waterwheel crew. I ordered a Rainier with a lemon wedge and sat in the bar’s far-right corner, near the water station, below a flat-screen TV broadcasting the Nebraska-Utah football game.

The opening wave of regulars saying goodbye to the Waterwheel trended at least a couple decades older than the largely zillennial crowd I’d seen populate the bar at night over the past year and a half, especially since the news broke in September 2024 that the establishment’s long-rumored demolition was finally a more-or-less-done deal. After that announcement, a digital countdown clock hung from the rafters above the bar’s Coors-branded analog clock, slowly coming down to zero as the Waterwheel rolled, largely merrily, toward some of its last-ever nights of karaoke, trivia, bingo, and live music:

“The

Waterwheel

Will keep turning for

Days Hrs Mins Secs

000 10: 54: 38

So Drink Up!”

Fast forward five hours — I may or may not have had a little stint at Sully’s Snowgoose Saloon on Phinney Ridge to lighten up — and the dynamic had completely shifted. The bar was full to the brim with (mainly young) people looking to say goodbye and ring in the New Year with a drunken dirge. A massive, patient, slow-moving line formed from the front bar to the sidewalk. And the patio’s bacchanal-y atmosphere reminded me of a tailgate. Come the wee hours of January 1, fireworks went off in the street, meshing with the fog to make for a spooky pyrotechnic farewell.

“Everything we said on record: Twenty years later, it’s what we live in. So why not walk in with that much more confidence?”

EXHIBIT B: COLUMBIA CITY ALE HOUSE (2000 - 2025)

Columbia City Ale House’s closure had less forewarning, and also featured less rambunctiousness. Opened in 2000, the Ale House brought English-pub flair to the South Seattle neighborhood, letting locals follow Premier-League soccer games from a cozy corner of Rainier Ave, fueled by made-from-scratch hot meals, sandwiches, and salads. Longtime bartender and local artist Emily Eberhart took over ownership of the Ale House in 2020. By 2025, confronting rising costs and a dilemma — whether to revamp the Ale House to attract Columbia City’s new clientele, or keep it as-is and face dwindling demand — Eberhart accepted an offer by women’s sports bar Rough & Tumble to take over the rest of her lease.

Meron’s reflections:

At the Columbia City Ale House closure, something I remember was the owner, Emily Eberhart, hugging someone every few minutes. But when you spoke to her about the closing she had such a genuine sense of relief. She was excited to get back to doing art that she had sidelined while running the Ale House.

There was also someone at the door who was managing table wait times, which I thought was funny, as the bar was such a locals’ location; half the reason you went was because you knew you wouldn’t be fighting for space.

I sat in the corner, and a couple people I spoke to were bartenders who had come through the Ale House at some point in their career. Everyone seemed happy Emily was going out on her terms, but there was also just a tinge of apathy — kind of just used to shit closing.

Also best tuna melt in Seattle, I’ll fight anyone bare-knuckle over it, RIP.

EXHIBIT C: THE SHANTY TAVERN (1948 - ?)

Of the three businesses we visited and mourned, only one still resembles its original form, at least from the outside: neither fenced up for demolition, nor supplanted by a new franchise. The Shanty Tavern has sat on its stretch of Lake City Way since 1948, with business going as far back as 1932, when prohibition-era Seattleites would congregate outside city limits to get boozy. John Spaccarotelli has owned the Shanty since 1961, and in December, at age 94, he decided to retire.

The roadhouse’s schedule had already gradually whittled down over the years to only being open on Fridays; its shutdown timetable stuck to that weekly schedule, involving a series of Friday parties to commemorate the Shanty’s many years of live music and revelry, and applaud Spaccarotelli’s decades at the helm.

CHUM News attended the December 12th edition of these sendoff soirées. Longtime patrons and first-timers alike lined up in an L-shaped queue in the bar’s parking lot, waiting over an hour to get into the tiny, people-packed wooden building, with the sound of an upbeat live band filtering out from its doors and eaves.

I talked to a couple in front of me who’d never been to the Shanty; they wanted to see it before it was gone for good. They asked me whether it was really true that John Spaccarotelli was as old as he was and still tending bar, as though they were about to witness an AARP-sponsored sideshow. Behind me, a couple seemingly in their 60s danced in the parking lot and twirled to music they could hear, but not see; the Shanty Tavern’s street sign offered a soft backlight for their number.

Once we made it to the front of the long line, we paid our cash cover, ordered a beer at the bar, and made a beeline for the far corner, where Canadian-folk-and-americana band Petunia & The Vipers was rocking out. The dancefloor was slammed: its dense square footage de facto designated for spectating, not dancing. The group’s double-bass player set up his phone against a windowsill, using his front-facing camera to FaceTime a contact from afar, adding another spectator to the mix. (No cover charge for the virtual concertgoer.)

Behind the bar, John and his family poured beers and wine, closed out tabs, and accepted patrons’ many well wishes. Some sadness, sure, but mainly a conveyed sense of accomplishment, a respectful acceptance of the transition being made on Spaccarotelli’s terms.

We left around midnight, but the party kept going. And it kept going despite the fender bender we saw outside — maybe the result of beer goggles mixing with Lake City Way’s dangerous stroad-y design. The revelry continued another couple weeks, including a February sendoff pouring out the rest of the beer in the Shanty’s taps and fridges; the venue might be available for special-event rentals, raising the question of whether the roadhouse is really closed for good, or perhaps just taking a bit of a breather.

Ross appeared to forget chunks of his lyrics, hovering conspicuously around a teleprompter to deliver his lines in a meek monotone.

EXPERT SOURCE #1: CYNTHIA BROTHERS (VANISHING SEATTLE)

Cynthia Brothers is the founder of and driving force behind Vanishing Seattle, a long-term project documenting the disappearance of small Seattle businesses, and the ways of life that found a home in those venues. Since its founding in 2016, Vanishing Seattle has recorded the comings and goings of hundreds of local businesses. The premise may sound like a plaintive exercise bemoaning the passage of time; but Brothers is careful to celebrate what’s still here, while also casting a light on the more structural reasons establishments might close (rising rents and costs, changing consumer tastes, speculative commercial real-estate ventures reshaping neighborhoods), and doing so without, in our opinion, veering into crotchety NIMBY-ism.

Brothers’s social media accounts are often the first to announce a business’s impending closure — if there’s any forewarning at all. Sometimes there isn’t: A devastating fire breaks out, a personal tragedy forces a permanent closure, an eviction takes place. Columbia City Ale House, the Waterwheel, and the Shanty had enough time to tell customers that they were closing, which can be cathartic for patrons and business owners alike, according to Brothers. “The question of giving people time to come and pay their respects to grieve is really important,” she told CHUM News.

Brothers sees a cocktail of factors making business operations tougher than they were a few years ago. Behavioral and cultural changes since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, have contributed to record-low rates of alcohol consumption, which have positive health implications, but can negatively affect business owners’ revenue. And the rising use of delivery apps may have contributed to decreased in-person patronage. Confronting those two variables is just part of the battle, Brothers implied. “There’s this systemic issue: All these costs are going up — cost of goods, cost of operating, rent — and margins get slimmer and slimmer until it's just unsustainable,” she said. Leases often run out at the end of the calendar year, and January and February are perennially slow months, typically leading to an above-average wave of closures before January 1, she added.

It’s a vicious cycle, Brothers explained: Consumers are dealing with rising costs, leading them to go out less. That means many restaurants and bars are increasing their prices, further disincentivising potential customers from visiting them. Businesses are dealing with rising costs of their own, from rent, to utilities, to insurance, to labor — as their own workers struggle to afford living in or near the city.

This confluence of forces is eroding our “connective tissue,” Brothers noted. Convivial spaces owned by people, rather than large corporations, are closing, depriving us of spaces where several generations can congregate. [Though we might add: Private-equity firms are also shuttering well-regarded national chains like Joann Fabrics by recklessly saddling them with long-term debt, forcing their eventual bankruptcy.] These spaces’ gradual disappearance is further coinciding with the decline of union labor, and the thinning out of fora like bowling alleys and some religious institutions, complicating our ability to share space across ages and backgrounds, and organize together to tackle multivariable crises.

Business closures are more of a symptom, less a cause, of major forces at play: sprouting from the atrophying of welfare systems, the effects of market speculation on real-estate and insurance costs, and a litany of Covid-induced shifts that exacerbate consumers’ and workers’ struggles. Closures can certainly fuel a feedback loop of change on their own, too, turning neighborhoods into ghost towns, or making way for uninspiring, hypercorporatized simulacra of community.

So many variables and timely needs prevent us, understandably, from keeping tabs on every business we have ever frequented; the news of a closure brings another crucial and limited resource, attention, back to businesses in their final days.

Sometimes, that attention can rally community members to save a beloved institution, or encourage a once-shuttered venue to return. There are “bright spots,” Brothers said: Bush Garden is reopening, and Scarecrow Video just announced a successful fundraising campaign. Since our interview, another neighborhood spot, Baker’s, a cocktail bar a klick west of the Waterwheel, announced that it wasn’t going to close after all. But attention isn’t a “silver bullet,” Brothers hedged.

EXPERT SOURCE #2: THE SEATTLE DEPTARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

The onus doesn’t lie solely in Seattle government’s hands, but what’s local government doing to support a healthy, local economy that can last for the long haul? To answer that question, we turned to the Seattle Department of Economic Development.

Eric Moss, the department’s communications director, pointed us to a recent blog post, “Helping Seattle’s small businesses grow,” which lists some programs meant to help small businesses confront everyday costs:

A storefront repair fund, which offers grants up to $3,000 to reimburse business owners for property damage;

A storefront security fund, with payouts up to $6,000 for installing preventative security measures with the assistance of a certified expert;

A program for accessing favorable loans, which pays down minority-owned businesses’ loans by up to $30,000;

Accounting and business-consulting assistance, up to 10 free hours;

Commercial-space assistance: helping with landlord advocacy, budget estimates, and commercial-kitchen operations;

Permitting assistance, with the goal of expediting the approval process for renovation and other key project permits;

And the Business Community Ownership Fund, which uses nonprofit money to stabilize commercial rent costs.

Those programs might sound quite policy-wonky, but they’ve allegedly generated some productive results. Moss cited one business facing closure because its landlord was selling the building it rented; with help from the Office’s consultants, the business owner was better able to understand the terms of their lease, and then purchase the building they rented through their first right of refusal.

Other programs concern themselves with making it easier to start a business: reducing the total number of permits needed to open a business, slashing the time it takes to secure those permits, and working with neighborhood business associations to spur demand in their enclaves.

Among other goals, the Office of Economic Development is tasked with working with businesses before they close to see “if there are any support programs or resources” the office can offer. Yet, driven by market pressures and pandemic-induced changes, small businesses are “at a tipping point for survival,” Moss said.

ANALYSIS

We learned a lot from our nights out, our informational interviews, and our digging into prior reporting and expert research:

Closures can offer — well — closure: a cathartic opportunity for patrons, owners, and workers to close up shop, and to do so on their own terms to the greatest extent they can.

That being said (stating the obvious), many closures don’t come from positive decision making. Funding runs dry, earnings dwindle, rents go up, customers hit hard times, the list goes on.

Sometimes the attention that closure announcements offer can help bring a business back from the brink of insolvency. Other times, it’s too little, too late.

Businesses’ connection to the real estate they occupy (whether they rent or own) can play a large role in how much agency an owner has over the end of their business.

No two closures are alike: Some have long timelines, while others happen literally overnight; some assume a sad, tragic tone, while others exude a “fuck it, we ball” vibe; and so on.

Seattle’s exorbitant cost of living fuels several closure-inducing feedback loops. Among others: Consumers’ financial struggles mean fewer diners eat out and frequent businesses, sometimes compelling business owners to raise prices in the hopes of covering their costs, further driving down demand. Wash, rinse, repeat.

The collective ability to respond to these forces is seemingly harder than it once was. Fewer people belong to labor unions and other civic institutions, which have often helped mobilize political and economic changes in the name of public wellbeing. Our atomization can get in the way of successful collective effort.

No singular variable can explain business closures, but economic, social, and political forces combine powerfully to shutter beloved businesses. Some variables are way beyond individual businesses’ control, like the rising cost of gas and insurance. Those stem from federal and state-level policies. Other variables can be meaningfully reined in by local government.

Despite that Seattle government’s current programming works more effectively for the opening of businesses, and less so preventing their closure. The retroactive nature of some of these programs seems somewhat counterintuitive — reimbursing businesses for costly property damage seems inadequate if those businesses are already financially strained. There have been some positive outcomes from current programs, but they seem to us as a patchwork featuring many holes, rather than a tight-knit, holistic system that can respond practically to a more general, latent, multivariable crisis.

What’s to be done?

Business closures are a political problem. The incumbent patchwork of city programs delivers results, but could benefit from a holistic strategy — and probably from more funding.

Mayor Wilson has recently discussed moving Seattle away from its overdependence on the tech industry for tax revenue and jobs by diversifying the city’s economy. Keeping existing jobs should be part of that vision, and is no doubt wrapped up in Mayor Wilson’s ambitious plans for housing, which can help buoy consumers’’ financial health and disposable income, and help address workers’ rising costs of living. Among other variables, it may be worth looking at whether certain kinds of commercial leases could benefit from some of the rental protections that accompany residential leases.

Many Seattle programs focus on the opening of new businesses; the city needs more programs that address keeping businesses afloat. That may also include helping businesses establish succession plans, as a lack thereof can effectively shutter otherwise healthy and viable institutions.

Grants that reimburse businesses for upgrades and repairs are probably an attempt to mitigate fraud, but they can also create cash-flow crunches. Even grants that offer half up front, or arrange for repairs through a vetted list of service providers, could mitigate those consequences.

Lastly, cultural shifts and — sorry! — the aggregate effects of individual consumer practices have affected the long-term health of local economies. Not to be all “vote with your wallet,” but keeping money in your community does do something. When and if you can, going down the street for your everyday purchases, versus, say, getting something off Amazon, is civically useful. And restaurants keep more of the money of your pickup order if you go get it yourself.

But this report isn’t a conclusion. INVITE TO START A CONVERSATION. MAYBE WE HAVE AN IN-PERSON EVENT??? GOOGLE FORM???